IGDA: Not Hacked (Or Maybe it Was!)

(Just to be clear: I did not have anything to do with the emails from “concerned_members_of_the_IGDA.” It caught me by surprise, and while I think it was a good attempt at grassroots organization, they could have been somewhat clearer that they did not represent the IGDA itself, and they should have signed names to it.)

(UPDATE: Everyone I spoke to prior to writing this who received a message had a public IGDA profile. It’s come to light that some people who definitely have private profiles also received a message from concerned_members. Seems like there might be some PHP hacking involved after all. Consulting some friends in security…)

IGDA members received an anonymous message yesterday urging them to sign the petition to call a member vote on the removal of Tim Langdell from his Board position.

Joshua Caulfield sent out an email to the IGDA membership today saying the following:

Dear Members,

Recently an email went out that appeared to have originated from IGDA. The return address of this email appeared as: “Concerned_Members_of_the_IGDA@IGDA.org.”
That email address was spoofed and the communication was not an official IGDA communication. We are currently reviewing the methods by which it was sent to see if this was sent out by people ignorant of proper use of the IGDA website or if there was malicious actions involved. We are also reviewing the method by which your email addresses were obtained and if that was done ethically or not. It is my hope that this was done by someone simply overzealous about their cause and not for destructive reasons.

Please be aware IGDA was not responsible for this email and does not have anything to do with the content or the links provided. You should read and use such links at your own risk.

We will investigate this issue and provide you with information on our findings as they are confirmed.

Thank you,

Joshua Caulfield
Executive Director
IGDA

It’s very clear from the email I received that it was not “spoofed.” The people who sent the message clearly used the IGDA’s web forms. The header of the email says it was mailed by ynilo.pair.com — well, pair.com happens to be the IGDA’s web host, so if it was sent via the IGDA’s PHP web form it would indeed be mailed by pair.com. Just to test it out, I sent the following message to a friend:

igda1

My friend forwarded me the email he received. The header and footer are identical to the email from “concerned_members”:

From: I_am_totally_anonymous <bad_address@example.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Subject: Message via IGDA Profile: I_am_totally_anonymous
To: (my friend)

I_am_totally_anonymous sends you the below message via your IGDA Member Profile:

This is my anonymous message to you.

-Nobody

—————————————–

You can reply to I_am_totally_anonymous at bad_address@example.com.

Note: You can change your public profile access, privacy and email settings via your MyProfile page:
http://www.igda.org/membership/myprofile.php

International Game Developers Association

So there you have it. It is clear that this was a group of people who decided to split up the Member Directory listings (which are publicly available to any paying IGDA member) and went down the list and messaged everyone using the form system. Nobody obtained email addresses through dubious means. It’s like sending a message via Facebook messaging, only in the IGDA’s Member Directory there’s no setting to say “only let my friends message me.” You’re either public or hidden, and the default is public.

These messages were not sent in an unethical or illegal way. If anything, the messages are a consequence of the rather poor state of the current IGDA website (having seen the new site, these issues will not come into play, it will be a lot more Facebook-like in terms of privacy).

I also want to say that I think it was a bad move for the “Concerned Members” to remain completely anonymous, but that’s neither here nor there. It wasn’t a hack, plain and simple.

6 Comments »

  1. Tom Buscaglia Said,

    August 5, 2009 @ 8:27 am

    I have been contacted by several people whose email address was not public in their profile. So, the explanation of how this was done is highly suspect.

    “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.”

    Tom B

  2. FISH Said,

    August 5, 2009 @ 8:45 am

    still not addressing the real issue.

  3. Scott Said,

    August 5, 2009 @ 9:34 am

    My profile is private and I got an email.

    That Member Email Contact Form url takes your IDGA Member ID. I suspect that if you can guess someones ID you can send them an email, even if their profile is private.

  4. Dave Weinstein Said,

    August 5, 2009 @ 11:57 am

    According to posts by one of those involved on the IGDA forums, that was precisely how it was done.

    The mailer page takes the Member ID in the URL, and does not check to see if the Member has a public profile or not. Since the Member IDs are predictable, it seems those behind the mailing simply used the IGDA mail page, and no email addresses were disclosed.

    What I am interested in is whether the mailer adds @igda.org to the sender if no domain is specified. If it does, then the web page is responsible for the appearance that it came from the IGDA. If it does not, then the senders acted poorly in adding an @igda.org address. Either way, someone should have created a mail address, and they should have used a real email address as the sender.

    Whether or not the mailers acted properly in emailing all IGDA members (whether or not they had made their profiles public) is another matter for discussion.

    Oh, and apparently it worked. According to reports, the 10% threshold to force a special meeting was met.

  5. Brian Beuken Said,

    August 5, 2009 @ 12:08 pm

    What does Tom’s comment mean in this context?
    Is the IGDA going to hell?

  6. nbreslin Said,

    August 6, 2009 @ 8:03 am

    I explained what happened here:
    http://www.igda.org/Forums/showthread.php?s=f5169c1425cd025a25749239db734cc4&threadid=36585&postid=228770

    Third post down. It had nothing to do with hacking. The form was just displaying your name, regardless of your privacy settings. Your e-mail was never displayed.

    The form mail page, however, is currently down for construction (though it still shows your name if someone puts in your User ID).

Leave a Comment

Powered by WP Hashcash